Is civil discourse possible re: the Desert Discovery Center?

scottsdale_independent_bannerThat’s the valid question that Melinda Gulick raises in an article recently published in the Scottsdale Independent. The article is entitled “Gulick: Desert Discovery Center debate getting lost in personal attacks, lies.”

According to an editorial note following the article, Gulick is a “mother, nature lover, and lifelong resident of Scottsdale.” Gulick describes her long relationship with the DDC and Scottsdale’s McDowell Sonoran Preserve in the article. I know her as an early supporter of Scottsdale’s Scenic Drive and from the time I spent as a member of the McDowell Sonoran Preserve Commission and as a member of the board of directors of the McDowell Sonoran Conservancy.

The reader comments following Gulick’s article are also insightful and it’s strongly recommended that you read them.

 

Read Scottsdale Independent Article

Author: Les Conklin

Les Conklin is a resident of north Scottsdale He founded Friends of the Scenic Drive, the Monte de Paz HOA and is the president of the Greater Pinnacle Peak Association. He was named to Scottsdale's History Maker Hall of Fame in 2014. Les is a past editor of A Peek at the Peak and the author of Images of America: Pinnacle Peak. He served on the Scottsdale's Pride Commission, McDowell Sonoran Preserve Commission, the boards of several local nonprofits and was a founding organizer of the city's Adopt-A-Road Program.. Les is a volunteer guide at the Musical Instrument Museum.

Share This Post On
468 ad

1 Comment

  1. Yes, civil discourse is possible – I have had several conversations w/ those who insist the DDC be only at the GWTH. Distilled, there are only 2 issues: 1. Location of DDC – on or off the Preserve & 2. use of funds designated for the Preserve allocated to the DDC.
    Since it was the voters who voted to tax themselves for a “Preserve’ (with no mention of the GW Bajada being purchased for commercial development), any further construction should also be submitted to the voters.
    Finally, no matter how “small” and inoffensive and blending the proposal turns out to be is irrelevant – once 4 City Councilmembers can authorize construction – they can continue to build anything they want ……keep thinking about that tram to a restaurant at Tom’s Thumb.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.