Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the disable-gutenberg domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/lestoil/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/lestoil/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /home2/lestoil/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
https://apeekatthepeak.org/civil-discourse-possible-re-desert-discovery-center/ A Scottsdale Community Publication Fri, 30 Sep 2016 03:24:29 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://apeekatthepeak.org/civil-discourse-possible-re-desert-discovery-center/#comment-2383 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 03:33:36 +0000 https://apeekatthepeak.org/?p=14865#comment-2383 Yes, civil discourse is possible – I have had several conversations w/ those who insist the DDC be only at the GWTH. Distilled, there are only 2 issues: 1. Location of DDC – on or off the Preserve & 2. use of funds designated for the Preserve allocated to the DDC.
Since it was the voters who voted to tax themselves for a “Preserve’ (with no mention of the GW Bajada being purchased for commercial development), any further construction should also be submitted to the voters.
Finally, no matter how “small” and inoffensive and blending the proposal turns out to be is irrelevant – once 4 City Councilmembers can authorize construction – they can continue to build anything they want ……keep thinking about that tram to a restaurant at Tom’s Thumb.

]]>