What’s Next for Desert Discovery Center / Desert Edge

October 3, 2017

By Kathy Littlefield, Scottsdale City Councilwoman 

"McDowell Sonoran Preserve Sunrise" by Susan Q. Byrd

“McDowell Sonoran Preserve Sunrise” by Susan Q. Byrd

Since last Tuesday’s City Council work study meeting to discuss the Desert Discovery Center/Desert Edge proposal many citizens have asked me what did the Council actually decide and what happens next with this controversial project. I cannot speak for my Council colleagues, but I want to make it crystal clear where I stand and what I will fight for on this issue.

First, I personally am opposed to the current Desert Discovery Center/Desert Edge proposal. One of my objections is financial – building the Desert Discovery Center/Desert Edge will drain a whopping 62 million taxpayer dollars from our Preserve and Bed Tax funds, diverting those dollars from more worthy projects with a better return to the city. Also, the annual operating deficit will have to be covered from the city’s General Fund, which means less money for public safety, streets, parks and other important municipal needs.

But my biggest objection to the current Desert Discovery Center/Desert Edge proposal is it is a commercial enterprise, and to allow this to be built in the Preserve would break the promises made when voters were asked to tax themselves almost a billion dollars to purchase the land for the Preserve. We were promised it would be a Preserve, not a park, and certainly not a commercial venture! Proponents of this project claim it is not a commercial enterprise, but it allows for food, alcohol and commercial sales and nightlife, 60 nights per year. All of this is not currently allowed under the Preserve Ordinance, which the Council would have to extensively modify to allow the project in the Preserve.

Kathy Littlefield

Despite these problems it appears a majority of the Councilmembers want to move ahead with building the Desert Discovery Center/Desert Edge in the Preserve and funding it with taxpayer dollars. If that is their wish I firmly believe the City Council has a moral and a legal obligation to seek permission from Scottsdale voters to do so. The Preserve is not just any piece of municipal property – it was sold to the voters as a special place and should be treated as such by the City Council.

But I cannot support the ballot language being considered by staff to “allow construction of Desert Edge in the Preserve, and prohibit future construction of projects of similar size, scope, and location to be built in the Preserve” because it forces voters into a “heads I win tails you lose” choice – if they vote “yes” they get commercial development in the Preserve, but if they vote “no” they are approving future commercial development in the Preserve. Most Scottsdale residents don’t want either of these bad outcomes! I believe the Council should simply reject the current Desert Discovery Center/Desert Edge proposal as a bad idea. But if the Council is going to put the current Desert Discovery Center/Desert Edge proposal to the voters it should be a straight up-or-down vote without any conflicting or confusing language. If voters are okay with this project, they can vote “yes;” if not, they can vote “no”. And we will know.

Either way, this debacle has made it clear we do need to put to the public the ballot language I proposed at Tuesday’s meeting; a clear, unambiguous Charter Amendment prohibiting any commercial development in the Preserve, now and into the future. It must be a Charter Amendment because an ordinance or General Plan Amendment can be overturned by a future City Council without consulting the voters. Such a Charter Amendment would give Scottsdale citizens what they were always promised: a true Preserve, free from commercial development, now and into the future.

As Preserve pioneer Carla said in a letter to the Tourism Development Commission: “The Preserve brought us together; it is now being used to tear us apart. Allow a vote to heal our community – if we do not allow this, we will not heal but this wound will continue to fester for years.”

Note. The next city council work study session will be held on September 26th. See the Desert Edge Alert article below for a summary of the complete public process.  Editor

Related Articles & Websites

Desert Edge Alert: Public Process Update  Article  ]

Some History of Desert Edge  Article

City of Scottsdale Website (Search “Desert Edge)  Website


The Peak Welcomes Your Comment

The Peak invites you to share your thoughts about this article by using the “Submit a Comment” box at the bottom of this page. All comments are reviewed based on The Peak’s Comment Policy prior to publishing.

GPPA Membership Make a Donation to GPPA Peak Advertisements & Advertorials 

 

 

 

 

Author: Les Conklin

Les Conklin is a resident of north Scottsdale He founded Friends of the Scenic Drive, the Monte de Paz HOA and is the president of the Greater Pinnacle Peak Association. He was named to Scottsdale's History Maker Hall of Fame in 2014. Les is a past editor of A Peek at the Peak and the author of Images of America: Pinnacle Peak. He served on the Scottsdale's Pride Commission, McDowell Sonoran Preserve Commission, the boards of several local nonprofits and was a founding organizer of the city's Adopt-A-Road Program.. Les is a volunteer guide at the Musical Instrument Museum.

Share This Post On
468 ad

2 Comments

  1. Thank you, Councilwoman Littleifield. You are obviously famliar with, and respectful of, the current Charter language.

    Post a Reply
  2. Kathy is so on track regarding the plan for Desert Edge. Under any circumstances, it needs to go to the voters with very specific yes/no language.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.