Choose Scottsdale: Economic Development Newsletter – Mar. 22

March 22, 2017

scottsdale_choose_newsletterbannerClick below to review the March 22nd issue of Choose Scottsdale: City of Scottsdale  Economic Development newsletter. You’ll find information about new business and educational initiatives and activities.

Newsletter (PDF)
The Peak invites you to share your thoughts about this article by using the “Submit a Comment” box at the bottom of this page. Your email address will not be published. All comments are reviewed based on The Peak’s Comment Policy prior to publishing.

Author: Les Conklin

Les Conklin is a resident of north Scottsdale He founded Friends of the Scenic Drive, the Monte de Paz HOA and is the president of the Greater Pinnacle Peak Association. He was named to Scottsdale's History Maker Hall of Fame in 2014. Les is a past editor of A Peek at the Peak and the author of Images of America: Pinnacle Peak. He served on the Scottsdale's Pride Commission, McDowell Sonoran Preserve Commission, the boards of several local nonprofits and was a founding organizer of the city's Adopt-A-Road Program.. Les is a volunteer guide at the Musical Instrument Museum.

Share This Post On
468 ad

1 Comment

  1. The problem with all this is that attracting both new residents and businesses, that are not related to tourism or that generate sales tax income, are a financial drain on the city and do not generate enough income for the city to match the increase in city expenses to service them. They both also dramatically increase traffic making it more difficult for all of us to get around, discouraging tourism, and stressing our infrastructure increasing maintenance costs. The city was sustainable attracting tourists and higher income residents (mostly single family residences) because both produced more income for the city than expenses, but most non retail businesses produce virtually no income for the city but do produce expenses. Similarly just adding more residents generates more expense than income for the city, again driving us away from being fiscally sustainable. In the end it means lower quality of life and higher taxes for us existing residents.
    All this is not just an opinion, it is backed up by facts and proper analysis of the city’s financial status and sustainability which are available to anyone who wants to investigate it.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.